

I leave the reader to judge the truth of these statements.

To this “letter of apology” he had been ordered to write, he attached a declaration in which he expounded the reasons for his disagreement with the accord. Jean stated that he would apologize for the form of his question, not for its content. Afterwards, he was ordered to issue a letter of apology to Bishop Fellay.įr. Jean declared in loud voice that “there is no obligation whatsoever to obey someone who contradicts Faith and Morals,” but he left the room. The Franciscan superior, also present, ordered Fr. Jean de Morgon, stood up and asked whether it was Bishop Fellay’s intention to accept “the Conciliar Church, the Modernist Rome.” As the Bishop hesitated, the religious insisted a second and a third time, but received no answer to his question. After his speech in which he gave an account of the recent steps regarding his relations with the Vatican, a Capuchin superior of the Convent of St. On February 5, Bishop Fellay was present at a meeting of the SSPX superiors in France that took place in St. TIA posted one sermon and an open letter that he wrote presenting his opposition to any accord. Basilio Meramo, who publicly stated his indignation over Bishop Fellay’s agreement with Rome, which he qualified as an apostasy. The first was from the Prior of Orizaba in Mexico, Fr. Two of them that recently came to TIA's knowledge appear to be just the tip of the iceberg. Reactions opposed to the accord of the SSPX leaders with Rome implying the acceptance of Vatican II “interpreted in the light of Tradition” seem to be growing among priests of the organization.

Fr Jean de Morgon confronts Bishop Fellay
